IPL6 T20 Cricket: DD Vs RR 07/05/2013 Results,Review and Statistical Highlights
DD Vs RR 07/05/2013 started with the Delhi Daredevils winning the toss and electing to bat first.Rajasthan Royals were playing at their home ground in Jaipur which meant they had the edge.Read on for the complete Results,Performance Review and Statistical Highlights of the match that took place today.
DD Vs RR 07/05/2013 - Results,Review and Statistical Highlights
Delhi daredevils had 6 changes to their side today in hopes of getting a victory for pride.Rajasthan Royals on the other hand seemed to have very less pressure as they were already in the top four in the points table,However a victory for them would ensure the home team to go further towards the top.That made watching this match even more interesting as both the teams were expected to give it their all.Lets now take a closer look at the Batting and bowling reviews of each teams.
DD Batting
When the Delhi Daredevils came into bat they once again lost regular wickets but a good partnership towards the end ensured they got to a competitive total.The highlights of their batting was Ben Rohrer who made 64 Runs,Mahela Jayawardene who made 34 Runs and Kedar Jadhav who made 23 Runs
RR Bowling
Rajasthan Royals bowling was up to the mark as they didn't give any easy runs to the Delhi Daredevils.All their bowlers chipped in with either getting wickets or containing the batsman.
RR Batting
The highlights of the Rajasthan Royals batting was Ajinkya Rahane and Rahul Dravid who laid a foundation with a century stand which helped Shane Watson to help the home team reach towards a comfortable victory quickly.They have undoubtedly made their home ground Jaipur as their fortress as they have won all the 7 of their last matches there.
DD Bowling
Delhi Daredevils bowling was once again Mediocre as they let the Rajasthan Royals win the match comfortably towards the end.Its looking impossible now for the DD to make it to the playoffs.There were high expectations from the team as it contained many big names but unfortunately they failed to deliver their talent during IPL6.They only managed to pick up one wicket.
DD Vs RR 07/05/2013 - Results/Scorecard
Delhi Daredevils innings (20 overs maximum) | Dismissal | R | B | 4s | 6s | SR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPMD Jayawardene* | c Dravid b Trivedi | 34 | 31 | 4 | 1 | 109.67 |
V Sehwag | b Faulkner | 11 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 157.14 |
CM Gautam† | c †Samson b Watson | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 66.66 |
DA Warner | c Sachin Baby b Binny | 13 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 72.22 |
BJ Rohrer | not out | 64 | 40 | 9 | 1 | 160 |
KM Jadhav | not out | 23 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 109.52 |
Extras | (lb 2, w 5) | 7 | ||||
Total | (4 wickets; 20 overs) | 154 | (7.70 runs per over) | |||
Did not bat AB Agarkar, M Morkel, UT Yadav, P Negi, S Kaul | ||||||
Fall of wickets 1-19 (Sehwag, 1.4 ov), 2-22 (Gautam, 2.4 ov), 3-47 (Warner, 7.3 ov), 4-78 (Jayawardene, 11.6 ov) | ||||||
Bowling | O | M | R | W | Econ | Extras |
SW Tait | 3 | 0 | 39 | 0 | 13 | (4w) |
JP Faulkner | 4 | 0 | 38 | 1 | 9.5 | (1w) |
SR Watson | 3 | 0 | 21 | 1 | 7 | |
STR Binny | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1.5 | |
P Tambe | 4 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 7.5 | |
SK Trivedi | 4 | 0 | 21 | 1 | 5.25 | |
Rajasthan Royals innings (target: 155 runs from 20 overs) | Dismissal | R | B | 4s | 6s | SR |
R Dravid* | c Agarkar b Kaul | 53 | 48 | 7 | 0 | 110.41 |
AM Rahane | not out | 63 | 45 | 5 | 1 | 140 |
SR Watson | not out | 28 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 200 |
Extras | (b 1, lb 1, w 9) | 11 | ||||
Total | (1 wicket; 17.5 overs) | 155 | (8.69 runs per over) | |||
Did not bat SV Samson†, STR Binny, BJ Hodge, Sachin Baby, JP Faulkner, SK Trivedi, P Tambe, SW Tait | ||||||
Fall of wickets 1-108 (Dravid, 13.4 ov) | ||||||
Bowling | O | M | R | W | Econ | Extras |
S Kaul | 3.5 | 1 | 23 | 1 | 6 | |
UT Yadav | 3 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 9.33 | (2w) |
M Morkel | 4 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 10 | |
AB Agarkar | 2 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 11 | |
P Negi | 4 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 7 | (2w) |
BJ Rohrer | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | (1w) |
What are your thoughts about the IPL6 T20 Cricket match DD Vs RR 07/05/2013 Results,Review and Statistical Highlights?
No comments:
Post a Comment